Brennan v. Brennan Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the United States Supreme Court defined “relating to” as “to stand in some relation; to have bearing or concern; to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• defining \relating to\ as \to stand in some relation; to have bearing or concern; to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• describing “relating to” as “broader in scope than the term ‘arising out of.’”
• affirming order dissociating partner when trial court found that partner had been convicted of fraud, exhibited continuing dishonesty regarding criminal wrongdoing, lodged baseless allegations that others committed fraud, and held veto power resulting in impasse
• discussing relationship of statutory standing provisions under Connecticut Uniform Partnership Act
• \[it] is a familiar principle of statutory construction that [when] the same words are used in a statute two or more times they will ordinarily be given the same meaning in each instance\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).