Brengettcy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “where the delay is not presumptively prejudicial, there is no need to review the remaining Barker factors”
• “Bren-gettcy indicates that, while awaiting trial, he was already incarcerated on an unrelated charge. Obviously, if Brengettcy was already in jail on unrelated charges, any prejudice that could have arisen merely from interference with his liberty is alleviated.”
• “Brengettcy indicates that, while awaiting trial, he was already incarcerated on an unrelated charge. Obviously, if Brengettcy was already in jail on unrelated charges, any prejudice that could have arisen merely from interference with his liberty is alleviated.”
• post-Milano decision of this Court approving aiding and abetting instruction not in the form adopted in Milano, distinguishing Berry v. State, 728 So. 2d 568, 570-71 (Miss. 1999), and Liggins v. State, 726 So. 2d 180, 184-85 (Miss. 1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).