Brende v. Brende

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court was not authorized to issue ruling based on future contingency and, as an advisory opinion, trial court's order was due to be vacated
• “It is an ancient and honored tenet of law that we do not take evidence from the briefs of the parties, we do not get evidence from outside the record, and we do not accept assertions of fact or evidence which were not before the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).