Brenda M. White, for Stanley A. Smith v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Speculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence”
• “Speculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence”
• “Speculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence.”
• “[s]peculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence.”
• “Speculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence”
• “Speculation is, of course, no substitute for evidence, and a decision based on speculation is not supported by substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).