· 11/2/2004
BRENDA J. JOHNSON PATRICIA K. ORMSTON, PLAINTIFFS—APPELLANTS v. U.S. BANCORP, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEES
Citations
- 387 F.3d 939
- 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2671
- 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22679
- 2004 WL 2434897
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a state-law contract claim for severance benefits was completely preemption by ERISA and properly dismissed where “[t]he alleged promise was that benefits would be paid in accordance with the [ERISA plan]”
- affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s alternative state law breach of contract claim
- “It is well-established that ERISA’s civil enforcement provisions are the exclusive remedies for participants seeking to recover benefits under an ERISA plan.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Smith, Dorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.