Skip to main content
· 11/2/2004

BRENDA J. JOHNSON PATRICIA K. ORMSTON, PLAINTIFFS—APPELLANTS v. U.S. BANCORP, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEES

Citations

  • 387 F.3d 939
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2671
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22679
  • 2004 WL 2434897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state-law contract claim for severance benefits was completely preemption by ERISA and properly dismissed where “[t]he alleged promise was that benefits would be paid in accordance with the [ERISA plan]”
  • affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s alternative state law breach of contract claim
  • “It is well-established that ERISA’s civil enforcement provisions are the exclusive remedies for participants seeking to recover benefits under an ERISA plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Smith, Dorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.