Skip to main content
· 1/23/2015

Brenda Benz-Elliott v. Barrett Enterprises, LP

Citations

  • 456 S.W.3d 140
  • 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 15
  • 2015 WL 294635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the gravamen of the claim was breach of contract, in part because the requested remedy of “[s]pecific performance . . . is available solely for breach of contract claims”
  • concluding that the gravamen of the claim was breach of contract, in part because the requested remedy of “[s]pecific performance . . . is available solely for breach of contract claims”
  • explaining that “to determine the governing statute of limitations, a court must ascertain the ‘gravamen of the complaint.’”
  • applying gravamen of the complaint to determine the applicable statute of limitations
  • “Although diminution in value damages may be recovered for both tort and contract claims, the diminution in value damages [the plaintiff] sought to recover flowed directly from her breach of contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.