Bremar v. Ohio Univ.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1382
Syllabus
Court of claims erred when it determined that an Ohio University student's claims against the University for breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence were barred by the statute of limitations, as the undisputed evidence and the University's student disciplinary appeals policy established that the student was dismissed from the University, and his cause of action accrued, when the Dean made a final decision in his disciplinary appeal. Because the student's complaint was filed less than two years after the final decision of the Dean, the student's claims were timely, and it was error to grant summary judgment for the University. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring expert testimony to demonstrate causal relationship between escalator's \narrow\ design and plaintiff's injuries and whether design met industry standards and governmental regulations
- affirming allowance of summary judgment where plaintiff failed to submit expert testimony
- dimensions essential to safe operation of escalator beyond scope of a juror’s common knowledge therefore requiring expert testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.