Brehm v. Mathis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “dragging more than twenty parties into court to litigate matters that have already been determined and claims that lack any substance” were “a near perfect example of frivolous conduct,” and imposed attorneys’ fees as a sanction
• affirming district court’s entry of a filing injunction requiring litigant “to seek permission before filing any additional suits pertaining to his prior state court litigation”
• affirming district court’s entry of a filing injunction requiring litigant “to seek permission before filing any additional suits pertaining to his prior state court litigation”
• affirming dismissal, pursuant to Rooker-Feldman, of claims by pro se plaintiff under such circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).