Breeding v. Polly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that § 1681i “by its express terms, limits the duty to conduct a reasonable investigation to consumer reporting agencies.”
• applying Simon’s general prohibition on pro se 22 representation of other parties to the class-action context
• explaining the plaintiff must allege “the material terms of a specific contract” 10 and “state which obligations a defendant allegedly breached”
• explaining the plaintiff must allege “the material terms of a specific contract” 17 and “state which obligations a defendant allegedly breached”
• dismissing a complaint 23 where the court could not discern what material obligation the defendant breached because the 24 court did not know the terms of the contract
• dismissing a complaint where the court could not discern what 21 material obligation the defendant breached because the court did not know the terms of the 22 contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).