Breeden v. City of Nome

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that property interest in benefits requires “claim[] of entitlement to those benefits”
• explaining that property interest in benefits requires “claim[] of entitlement to those benefits”
• discussing statute governing terms of employment with city as well as employee's contract with city in order to determine whether employee had protected property interest in employment
• twenty-four hour notice period “a time period not justified by the urgency of the city’s interests involved”
• twenty-four hour notice period \a time period not justified by the urgency of the city's interests involved\
• \A person who is employed 'at the pleasure' of his employer has no 'property' interest in continued employment that is protected by due process.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).