Bredwell v. Loan & Investment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, with respect to a medical condition “uncommon to everyday experience . . . expert medical testimony [is required] before any conclusions can be drawn about its effect on the capacity to do a given job over a given time”
• observing, \legislation merely regulating economic benefits and burdens . . . is reviewable under the rational basis criterion when challenged . . . under the due process clause\
• reviewing unpreserved claims in part because “similar claims may be raised in the future”
• issues must be raised at earliest possible time to allow trial forums full opportunity to come to sound conclusions and to correct claimed errors in first instance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).