Skip to main content

Bredemann v. Bredemann

Citations

  • 253 Minn. 21
  • 91 N.W.2d 84
  • 1958 Minn. LEXIS 647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where plaintiff had full knowledge of the facts but failed to take action for 10 years,^ her delay was unreasonable and constituted laches
  • where plaintiff had full knowledge of the facts but failed to take action for 10 years, her delay was unreasonable and constituted laches
  • divorce decrees are specifically omitted from the provisions of Rule 60.02
  • divorce decrees are specifically omitted from the provisions of Rule 60.-02

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bredemann v. Bredemann

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.