Breckenridge v. Cambridge Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A party who has had an opportunity to read a contract before signing, but signs before reading, cannot later plead lack of understanding.”
• party who signs a contract cannot later claim that he or she did not understand it
• “[a] party who has had an opportunity to read a contract before signing, but signs before reading, cannot later plead lack of understanding”
• statements made to prospective home buyer that house would be delivered in “perfect” condition
• “A party who has had an opportunity to read a contract before signing, but signs before reading, cannot later plead lack of understanding.”
• statements that the home would be “perfect” and built with “expert workmanship” and “custom quality” were reasonably construed as “puffing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).