Skip to main content
· 4/7/2006

Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 444 F.3d 1356
  • 78 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1581
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8507
  • 2006 WL 895208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in dicta, that personal jurisdiction over a defendant corporation was supported when it “developed a valuable customer base and generated goodwill through advertising and educational initiatives that potentially enhanced the future sales of its exclusive distributor”
  • jurisdiction over patentee that also entered into an exclusive license with an entity in the forum state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Friedman, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.