Breazil v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no violation of eighth amendment as long as the inmate receives nutritionally adequate food that does not present an imminent health risk
• no violation of eighth amendment as long as the inmate receives nutritionally adequate food that does not present an imminent health risk
• no Eighth Amendment violation where inmate was placed on pre-hearing restricted diet consisting of “Nutriloaf’ and one cup of raw cabbage for one week, and a post-hearing restricted diet consisting of Nutriloaf and cabbage for 45 days
• characterizing restrictive diet of Nutriloaf-and-cabbage as “punitive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).