Brazzel v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a void act is “one entirely null within itself, not binding on either party” (citation omitted)
• explaining that a voidable act is “binding until disaffirmed”
• relying on precedent in Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78, 81 (Tex. 1880) for the proposition that a void act is entirely null, not binding on either party, and not susceptible of ratification or confirmation
• relying on precedent in Murchison v. White , 54 Tex. 78 , 81 (Tex. 1880) for the proposition that a void act is entirely null, not binding on either party, and not susceptible of ratification or confirmation
• discussing the distinction between void and voidable judicial acts
• distinguishing between a void and voidable act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).