Brazina v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Ninth Circuit has not 19 found occasion to address Tapscott, and no other circuit has adopted its rationale
• “In 5 considering fraudulent joinder, the court does not review the merits of [the] claim but only 6 determines whether a cause of action exists under [state] law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).