Brazerol v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, where the plaintiff gave permission for an intrusion upon real property, there was no “unauthorized entry and hence no trespass”
• plaintiff who moved her car to allow dump truck to enter onto her property could not sue dump truck operator for trespass
• landowners who consented to entry of dump truck on their land to transport materials to adjoining property could not recover for trespass and alleged crack in their basement wall
• “Every unauthorized entry upon the property of another is a trespass which entitles the owner to a verdict for some damages.” (quoting Patapsco Loan Co. v. Hobbs, 98 A. 239, 241 (Md. 1916))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).