Brayman v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board reviews Immigration Judge’s predictions about what will happen for clear error
• holding that while the Board reviews for clear error predictive findings about what will occur, whether the predicted outcome satisfies the regulatory definition of torture is a legal issue subject to de novo review
• noting that the Board reviews predictive findings for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).