· 6/22/2009
Brayboy v. Workforce
Citations
- 681 S.E.2d 567
- 383 S.C. 463
- 2009 S.C. LEXIS 157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- making its findings based on its view of the preponderance of the evidence because the issue of Bray-boy’s employment status was jurisdictional
- explaining Cooper \is a jurisdictional issue\ and that the Court \must determine if [claimant] was an employee at the time of his injury\
- explaining Cooper \is a jurisdictional issue\ and that the Court \must determine if [claimant] was an employee at the time of his injury\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.