Skip to main content
· 6/22/2009

Brayboy v. Workforce

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 567
  • 383 S.C. 463
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • making its findings based on its view of the preponderance of the evidence because the issue of Bray-boy’s employment status was jurisdictional
  • explaining Cooper \is a jurisdictional issue\ and that the Court \must determine if [claimant] was an employee at the time of his injury\
  • explaining Cooper \is a jurisdictional issue\ and that the Court \must determine if [claimant] was an employee at the time of his injury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.