Bray v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 203
Syllabus
<p>Theft—Fraudulent intent should be left to the jury__ Where there is evidence from which the jury might infer that the taking was not fraudulent, it is the right of the defendant to have the distinction between trespass and theft clearly given in the charge to the jury.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- murder from committing injury to a child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Celis, Mauricio RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-15· cited 191×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 85×
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-04-06· cited 18×
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1891-06-24· cited 7×
- Brown v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 5×
- Thompson, JoshuaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Sigler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Ainsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-07-01
- Winn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1884-12-06
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.