Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/9/1980
Bray v. State
Citations
- 597 S.W.2d 763
- 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that warrantless search of apartment’s bathroom conducted by police officer, who entered premises after fire department personnel informed officer that there was no immediate danger and left the scene, was not justified by emergency doctrine
- adjudging that “[ojfficers may enter a building where a ‘body’ has been reported, for the report of death may be inaccurate and it may be possible to revive the body.”
- stating “[a] warrantless search may be justified by a need to act immediately to protect or preserve life or to prevent serious injury”
- presence of man who was “very intoxicated” as a result of injection of some type of narcotics not an emergency to warrant entry
- police arrived at residence after medical personnel assessed situation, concluded there was no emergency, and left
- police arrived at residence after medical personnel assessed situation, concluded there was no emergency, and left
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion P. J., and Roberts, and Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brimage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 376×
- Hulit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 227×
- Becknell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-19· cited 136×
- Kenneth Lee Douds v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-06-05· cited 77×
- Janicek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-09· cited 66×
- Pine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-22· cited 46×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-04· cited 44×
- Roth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-11-15· cited 40×
- Roeder v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-12-29· cited 36×
- Tuffiash v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-05-21· cited 32×
- Steven Cole v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-12-18· cited 27×
- Rauscher v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-01-29· cited 24×
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-01-19· cited 24×
- Torrez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-21· cited 23×
- State v. MountfordSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-29· cited 22×
- Gipson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-06-26· cited 21×
- Montelongo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-27· cited 18×
- State v. Marli Shealyn ElrodTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-02-27· cited 17×
- Rheinlander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-01-11· cited 15×
- Eatmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-08-28· cited 14×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- Helen Frances Sutton Root v. Isabel H. GauperEighth Circuit· 1971-02-25· cited 124×
- Corbett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-01· cited 78×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-23· cited 19×
- Tijerina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-21· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.