District of Columbia· 8/17/1990
Bray v. RHT, INC.
Citations
- 748 F. Supp. 3
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14154
- 1990 WL 162064
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a plaintiff cannot “merely invoke his race in the course of a claim’s narrative and automatically be entitled to pursue relief.”
- noting that a plaintiff “cannot merely invoke h[er] race in the course of a claim’s narrative and automatically be entitled to pursue relief”
- dismissing the plaintiffs intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and calling it “frivolous” where the plaintiff was refused service and escorted from defendant’s establishment on one day, but the next day was served without issue
- plaintiff must allege some facts that “demonstrate that [her] race was the reason for defendant’s actions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stanley S. Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Darryl Morris and Leggitt Nailor v. Office Max, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1996-07-12· cited 235×
- Middlebrooks v. Godwin Corp.District of Columbia· 2010-06-25· cited 81×
- Alexander v. Washington Gas Light Co.District of Columbia· 2006-02-23· cited 38×
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2003-03-11· cited 34×
- Mesumbe v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2010-04-19· cited 31×
- Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-04· cited 27×
- Morris v. Carter Global Lee, Inc.District of Columbia· 2013-11-05· cited 18×
- White v. Denny's Inc.D. Colorado· 1996-03-21· cited 16×
- Hodges v. Washington Tennis Service International, Inc.District of Columbia· 1994-12-15· cited 12×
- Jackson v. Tyler's Dad's Place, Inc.District of Columbia· 1994-04-21· cited 12×
- Wilson v. DNC Servs. Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-06-22· cited 10×
- Mekuria v. Bank of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-23· cited 9×
- Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-08-06· cited 8×
- Kungle v. Executive Officers, State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-16· cited 7×
- Carty v. CVS Pharmacy, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-11· cited 4×
- Jackson v. ABC LIQUORSM.D. Florida· 1997-09-10· cited 2×
- Ridley v. VMT Long Term Care Management, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-09-18· cited 2×
- Brown v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-30
- Ndondji v. Interpark, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-03-09
- Amiri V.gelman Management CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-08-19
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 2,518×
- Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of InvestigationSeventh Circuit· 1982-07-12· cited 140×
- The Network Project v. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1977-07-22· cited 46×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 42×
- Westray v. Porthole, Inc.D. Maryland· 1984-05-22· cited 35×
- Jaffe v. Federal Reserve Bank of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 1984-06-05· cited 19×
- Rowe v. KiddDistrict of Columbia· 1990-02-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.