Bray v. Providence Journal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the word “testimony” could not be enlarged to mean testimony “under oath” because there was no extrinsic evidence to demonstrate that the testimony at issue was known to be taken under oath
• “[I]n considering whether the article was defamatory of plaintiff, both the headline and the body of the article were to be considered as one document.”
• “(I)n considering whether the article was defamatory of plaintiff, both the headline and the body of the article were to be considered as one document.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).