· 11/20/1957
Bray v. Main
Citations
- 212 Or. 61
- 318 P.2d 266
- 1957 Ore. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that disgorgement may be justified “to avoid unjust enrichment” or “if necessary to protect the plaintiff by deterring a willful infringer from further infringement”
- noting that 7 “injunctive relief may be adequate if there has been no fraud or palming off”
- applying Safe Distance Rule only after defendant had been found in contempt of an injunction
- noting \the Lanham Act's designation of an accounting of defendant's profits as an equitable remedy\
- applying Safe Distance Rule where infringer simply tried to escape liability by changing infringing “Heritage Series” to “H-Series”
- approving the scope of a permanent injunction under the safe-distance rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cueiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.