Bray v. Bray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[m]any courts have also taken into consideration the tenant’s actions after receiving notice by the landlord of the termination of the lease, looking favorably on any actions by the tenant to cure the default or evidencing an intent to prevent the forfeiture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• 19 Perry Street, LLC v. Unionville Water Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-02· cited 28×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fellows v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-01-01· cited 113×
• Cross v. Huttenlocher
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-18· cited 78×
• City of Bristol v. Ocean State Job Lot Stores of Connecticut, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-18· cited 46×
• City of New Haven v. Bonner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-18· cited 46×
• Visco v. Cody
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-27· cited 45×
• Eamiello v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-08-16· cited 38×
• Nicoli v. Frouge Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-06-29· cited 35×
• Young v. Young
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-13· cited 35×
• Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Dairy Mart, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-15· cited 29×
• Seven Fifty Main Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Spector
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-09-03· cited 17×
• Sproviero v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-06-17· cited 16×
• Housing Authority v. Olesen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-05-18· cited 15×
• Elliott v. South Isle Food Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-03-11· cited 14×
• Liberty Mobilehome Sales, Inc. v. Eamiello
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 13×
• Barry v. Historic District Commission
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-01· cited 11×