Braxton v. Wood's adm'r

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
• distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts are done with intent to take private property for public use
• distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
• due process provision has no application to a case involving immunity of state or subordinate agency
• Article I, section 10, has \no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state\
• Article I, section 10, has “no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).