Skip to main content
· 4/14/1992

Braxton v. Faber

Citations

  • 604 A.2d 543
  • 91 Md. App. 391
  • 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, even at trial, defendant’s failure to list expert witness in her answers to interrogatories did not disqualify expert or unfairly prejudice plaintiff, because plaintiffs attorney “participated fully” in deposition of the expert
  • “[W]e cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in not imposing sanctions” for discovery violation
  • “[W]e cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in not imposing sanctions” for discovery violation
  • “it is incumbent upon counsel [during trial] to state with clarity the specific objection to the [allegedly biased] conduct and ... make known the relief sought” when challenging a trial court for bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wenner, Davis, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.