· 4/14/1992
Braxton v. Faber
Citations
- 604 A.2d 543
- 91 Md. App. 391
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, even at trial, defendant’s failure to list expert witness in her answers to interrogatories did not disqualify expert or unfairly prejudice plaintiff, because plaintiffs attorney “participated fully” in deposition of the expert
- “[W]e cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in not imposing sanctions” for discovery violation
- “[W]e cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in not imposing sanctions” for discovery violation
- “it is incumbent upon counsel [during trial] to state with clarity the specific objection to the [allegedly biased] conduct and ... make known the relief sought” when challenging a trial court for bias
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wenner, Davis, Motz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.