Braxton v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trial court did not err when admitting an excited utterance, even though the record did \not establish how much time elapsed\ between the event and the statement
• “[I]n the case of statements -6- made by young children, the element of trustworthiness underscoring the spontaneous and excited utterance exception finds its source primarily in the child’s lack of capacity to fabricate such a story.” (alteration in original
• appellant has the burden to prove the trial court erred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).