Skip to main content

Bravo v. State

Citations

  • 47 Fla. 13

Syllabus

<p>An information charging that the accused in a named county and at a stated time “did then and there have charge, control and management of a gaming table and did then and there procure, suffer and permit divers persons to your informant unknown to play thereon for money at games of cards and other games of chance contrary,” etc., does not charge an offense under the second clause of section 2644, Rev. Stats., 1892, because its allegations fail to show that the accused procured, suffered or permitted persons to play for money at games in a place of which he had charge, control or management.</p>

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.