Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Ninna, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a party moving for default judgment is entitled to reasonable inferences
• declining to pierce veil where plaintiff claimed, among other connections, that defendants had “a unity of interest and ownership”
• noting that “it is well-established that a corporation may not appear in the Second Circuit unless represented by counsel” (citing Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Cont’l Record Co., 386 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir.1967) (per curiam))
• noting that “it is well-established that a corporation may not appear in the Second Circuit unless represented by counsel” (citing Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Continental Record Co., 386 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir.1967) (per curiam))
• noting that “it is well-established that a corporation may not appear in the Second Circuit unless represented by counsel” (citing Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Cont’l Record Co., 386 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir. 1967) (per curiam))
• noting that “it is well-established that a corporation may not appear in the Second Circuit unless represented by counsel” (citing Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Cont’l Record Co., 386 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir. 1967) (per curiam))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).