Skip to main content
· 6/27/2012

Braunstein v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 683 F.3d 1177
  • 2012 WL 2401993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that an action brought 16 without standing does not constitute a case or controversy
  • noting that Congress has abrogated the Eleventh Amendment immunity of states for 21 Title VI suits so that suits may be brought against officials in their official capacities
  • setting forth standard of review and requirements for Article III standing
  • “[S]overeign immunity precludes §§ 1981 and 1983 11 damages claims against state entities and state actors in their official capacity.”
  • contractor wouldn’t have received work regardless of discriminatory criteria
  • setting forth constitutional standing requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Kleinfeld, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.