Braun v. Target Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that corroborative evidence of intoxication may be in the form of expert testimony explaining how a particular BAC would affect an injured party’s fitness to perform the activity in question
• holding that corroborative evidence of intoxication may be in the form of expert testimony explaining how a particular BAC would affect an injured party’s fitness to perform the activity in question
• holding evidence demonstrated more than mere hint of intoxication where (1) Mr. Braun consumed alcohol throughout day before accident; (2) witnesses observed Mr. Braun drink beer at lunch shortly before accident; (3
• holding evidence demonstrated more than mere hint of intoxication where, inter alia, Mr. Braun’s BAC was 0.27%, and expert opined Mr. Braun’s high BAC would render him physically and behaviorally impaired and drastically increase his risk of falling
• finding occupancy requirement satisfied where the company’s project manager was on site every day and easy to locate, and where the company kept a trailer on site
• finding occupancy where the project 5 manager “was on site every[]day and easy to locate if needed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).