Skip to main content
· 2/18/1997

Braun v. Chronicle Publishing Co.

Citations

  • 52 Cal. App. 4th 1036
  • 61 Cal. Rptr. 2d 58
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1119
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 1642
  • 25 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1594
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that although investigation was closed to public, topic and event were still connected to public issue
  • explaining that news reporting \ is free speech\
  • reiterating that section 425.16 applies to media defendants
  • affirming grant of media organization’s SLAPP motion and award of attorneys’ fees
  • explaining that news reporting “is free speech”
  • reaching same conclusion regarding newspaper articles reporting on an investigative audit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poche

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.