Braun v. Board of Dental Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[a]s a body composed primarily of dental professionals, the Board has the power to apply its own expertise in evaluating the evidence”
• noting the presumption in interpretation that the legislative body did not “intend an interpretation that would lead to absurd or irrational consequences.”
• Legislature is presumed not to have intended interpretation that would lead to absurd or irrational results
• statutes construed with presumption “that the Legislature does not intend an interpretation that would lead to absurd or irrational consequences”
• statutes construed with presumption “that the Legislature does not intend an interpretation that would lead to absurd or irrational consequences”
• statutes construed with presumption “that the Legislature does not intend an interpretation that would lead to absurd or irrational consequences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).