Braude v. Wirtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that section 313(a) does “not expand the category of applicable substantive requirements with which federal facilities must comply” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• defining Clean Water Act “requirements” as “objective, administratively predetermined effluent standard[s] or limitation[s] or administrative order[s] upon which to measure the prohibitive levels of water pollution”
• “[T]o the degree the Supreme Court’s ruling in [EPA] construed the substantive ‘requirements’ of [section 1323] to mean effluent limitations, such ruling was unaffected by the 1977 amendments enacted by Congress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).