Brashear Freight Lines, Inc. v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 2 Defendants also rely on Chaveriat v. Williams Pipe Line Co., 11 F.3d 1420, 1427 (7th Cir. 1993
• finding that corrections officer’s counsel at the OAG’s unsuccessful attempts to obtain requested documents from DOCCS did not preclude a finding of control
• noting that the party received “at least some of th[e] requested docu- ments” from a nonparty and finding that this “demonstrate[d] a degree of ‘close coordination’” (alterations added
• finding misconduct files subject to discovery where information could be used for permissible purposes including Rule 608(b) impeachment
• finding misconduct files subject to discovery where information could be used for permissible purposes including Rule 608(b) impeachment
• finding shared interest where employee of DOCCS was “carry[ing] out [ ] public objectives on behalf of DOCCS” (alterations added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).