Brascom v. Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court also considered a host of legitimate reasons
• “It is the defendant’s burden to demonstrate that the conduct which led to his state sentences is relevant conduct to his federal offense.”
• ex- plaining that “[r]elevant conduct determinations are factual determinations, which may only be reversed for clear error”
• preserved constitutional challenges to release conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).