Skip to main content
· 3/18/1986

Brantley v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Citations

  • 506 A.2d 970
  • 95 Pa. Commw. 641
  • 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We [have] reasoned that for collateral estoppel to apply, the ultimate issues in the criminal trial must be identical to [the] issue or issues sought to be precluded from consideration at the parole revocation hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crumlish, Rogers, Kalish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.