· 3/18/1986
Brantley v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
Citations
- 506 A.2d 970
- 95 Pa. Commw. 641
- 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2004
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We [have] reasoned that for collateral estoppel to apply, the ultimate issues in the criminal trial must be identical to [the] issue or issues sought to be precluded from consideration at the parole revocation hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crumlish, Rogers, Kalish
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.