Skip to main content
· 8/5/2009

Brant v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District

Citations

  • 213 P.3d 869
  • 230 Or. App. 97
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1099
  • 2009 WL 2382955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding public transportation district is a common carrier that “owes its passengers the highest degree of care and skill practicable for it to exercise”
  • “Tri- Met is a common carrier and therefore owes its passengers the highest degree of care and skill practicable for it to exercise.” (quotation omitted)
  • on a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a negligence case based on the standard of care, “the question is whether [the] plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to allow a jury to find that the [defendant] was negligent”
  • to survive a motion for summary judgment, the party with the burden of proving a claim must present evidence that gives the factfinder a basis \other than sheer speculation\ to conclude that the elements of the claim have been met
  • to survive a motion for summary judgment, the party with the burden of proving a claim must present evidence that gives the factfinder a basis “other than sheer speculation” to con- clude that the elements of the claim have been met
  • to survive a motion for summary judgment, the party with the burden of proving a claim must present evidence that gives the factfinder a basis “other than sheer speculation” to con- clude that the elements of the claim have been met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Sercombe, Norby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.