Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant’s testimony as to his personal belief of what contract meant was “incompetent and inadmissible”
• “[I]t is now a settled principle of the law of 22 contract that the undisclosed intentions of the parties are, in the absence of mistake, fraud, 23 etc., immaterial; and that the outward manifestation or expression of assent is 24 controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).