Skip to main content
· 9/25/2000

Branstad v. Glickman

Citations

  • 118 F. Supp. 2d 925
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14899
  • 2000 WL 1520686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting how “the fact that notice is provided does not necessarily mean that the relief granted will be a preliminary injunction rather than a TRO”
  • “[a] TRO, which may be granted ex parte, plainly does not require an adversarial hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.