Brannigan v. City of Plattsburgh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that manufacturer had no duty to warn its purchasers (retailer and transporter of gas
• holding that the trial court erred when it refused to provide a jury instruction regarding whether the propane distributor had a duty to warn
• holding that the trial court erred when it refused to provide a jury instruction regarding whether the propane distributor had a duty to warn
• concluding that state-of-the-art evidence is relevant because “state of the art sets the parameters of feasibility”
• ordering trial on issue of whether supplier of portable propane cylinder had duty to warn under section 388
• ordering trial on issue of whether supplier of portable propane cylinder had duty to warn under section 388

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).