Brandt v. VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILL.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injury-in-fact was established where the “probability [of injury] is materially greater than zero”
• “Standing exists when’ the plaintiff suffers an actual or impending injury, no matter how small.... ”
• “Predictions . . . need to be proved” to show a ripe Article III injury.
• plaintiff can establish standing based on “actual or impending injury, no matter how small”
• “Any pre-enforcement suit entails some element of chance.... ”
• political promoter who wanted to host officials and candidates in his home had standing to challenge law that required sponsors of political events to bear the costs of all “special services” provided by municipality because of event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).