Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply UCC to claim for defective product because predominate purpose of contract was medical services
• ‘‘it is not reasonable to infer that [the plaintiff] simply went to the hospital, bought 11 The plaintiff also argues that, because the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).