Brandt Consolidated, Inc. v. Agrimar Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss Lanham Act claim based on allegation that defendant sent false patent infringement letters to plaintiff and its customer
• “threat to plaintiffs sales posed by Defendant’s claims of patent exclusivity raises a viable Lanham Act claim”
• “this Court can assert jurisdiction over an out-of-state parent (or grandparent) corporation through the activities of its subsidiary”
• agent’s “jurisdiction-triggering activities can be imputed to” principal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).