Brandon Raub v. Michael Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a finding of qualified immunity extends only to an individual defendant’s liability for damages
• stating that First Amendment retaliation claims require the claimant to show that “but for” her protected expression, the defendant would not have taken the purportedly retaliatory action
• ruling on whether violation was clearly established law without reaching constitutionality of particular scenario
• ruling on whether violation was clearly established law without reaching constitutionality of particular scenario
• explaining that protected expression must be “but for” cause of retaliation
• explaining that “[i]n the arrest context, a law enforcement officer’s omission of material facts from a warrant affidavit deprives him of qualified immunity . . . if the omission was made intentionally or with a ‘reckless disregard for the truth’” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).