Skip to main content
· 3/1/2018

Brandon Ivory Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trellises were not land improvements, but that the drip irrigation system was a land improvement
  • finding that the third factor suggested that trellises and the drip irrigation system were land improvements because they were expected to service the grapevines during their useful lives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.