Brandon Edwards v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that INS must prove each ground of deportability by “clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence”
• holding that “no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true”
• holding that no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by “clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true.”
• holding that “no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true”
• holding that “no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true”
• holding that the government must prove deportability by “clear, unequivocal, and convincing” evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).