Brandenburg v. All-Fleet Refinishing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presumption was rebutted when appealing party presented evidence that delay was caused not by it but by the insurance carrier
• holding that trial court made sufficient findings of fact when it dismissed appeal
• finding that delay was not inexcusable when it appeared to have been caused by an insurance company, rather than the party
• finding that a delay was not inexcusable when it appeared to he caused by an insurance company, not the party
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to dismiss appeal, where court “found the delay was excusable because it appeared to have been caused by the insurance carrier rather than the party”
• “[T]he clearly erroneous test is the same as the any evidence rule[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).